15,442
回編集
差分
ナビゲーションに移動
検索に移動
The 19th-century visionary [[Anne Catherine Emmerich]], in a twist echoed nowhere else, claims that the phrase "the Great Pan" was actually a demonic epithet for [[Jesus Christ]], and that "Thamus, or Tramus" was a watchman in the port of [[Nicaea]], who, at the time of the other spectacular events surrounding Christ's death, was then commissioned to spread this message, which was later garbled "in repetition."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Emmerich |first1=Anne Catherine |title=The Life of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, volume IV |date=2006 |publisher=Saint Benedict Press |location=Charlotte, NC |isbn=9781905574131 |page=309 |url=https://tandfspi.org/ACE_vol_04/ACE_4_0301_out.html#ACE_4_p0309 |access-date=16 May 2021}}</ref>
→「偉大な神パーンは死んだ」
ラブレーの『パンタグリュエル』第4巻（16世紀）において、巨人パンタグリュエルはプルタルコスの語った物語を回想した後、この発表は実際にはほぼ同じ時期（ティベリウス治世の終わり頃）に行われたイエス・キリストの死についてだったと考え、「彼はギリシャ語で合法的にパーンと言うことができる、彼は我々のすべてであるから。私たちのすべて、私たちの生きるすべて、私たちの持つすべて、私たちの希望は、彼であり、彼によって、彼から、彼においてなのだ。」と名前の適切さを指摘した<ref>François Rabelais, Fourth Book of Pantagruel (''Le Quart Livre''), Chap. 28 [https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Fourth_Book/Chapter_XXVIII].</ref>。この解釈において、ラブレーはギヨーム・ポステルの『デ・オービス・テラエ・コンコルディア（De orbis terrae concordia）』に倣っていた<ref>Guillaume Postel, ''De orbis terrae concordia'', Book 1, Chapter 7.</ref>。
19世紀の空想家アンヌ・カトリーヌ・エメリッヒは、どこにもないひねりを加えて、「大パン」というフレーズは実際にはイエス・キリストに対する悪魔の称号であり、「タムス、またはトラマス」はニカイアの港の見張り役で、キリストの死を取り巻く他の壮絶な出来事の時に、このメッセージを広めるよう委託され、後に「反復して文字化けした」と主張している<ref>Emmerich, Anne Catherine, The Life of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, volume IV , 2006, Saint Benedict Press, Charlotte, NC, isbn:9781905574131, page309, https://tandfspi.org/ACE_vol_04/ACE_4_0301_out.html#ACE_4_p0309, 16 May 2021</ref>。
In modern times, [[G. K. Chesterton]] has repeated and amplified the significance of the "death" of Pan, suggesting that with the "death" of Pan came the advent of theology. To this effect, Chesterton claimed, "It is said truly in a sense that Pan died because Christ was born. It is almost as true in another sense that men knew that Christ was born because Pan was already dead. A void was made by the vanishing world of the whole mythology of mankind, which would have asphyxiated like a vacuum if it had not been filled with theology."<ref>G.K. Chesterton, [http://www.worldinvisible.com/library/chesterton/everlasting/part1c8.htm "The End of the World"], ''The Everlasting Man'', 1925</ref><ref>{{cite book |date=1986 |title=The Collected Works of G.K. Chesterton II |location=San Francisco |publisher=Ignatius Press |pages=292 |isbn=978-0-89870-116-6}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |date=2004 |title=Orthodoxy |location=New York |publisher=Dover Publications, Inc. |pages=69 |isbn=978-0-486-43701-9}}</ref> It was interpreted with [[Polysemy|concurrent meanings]] [[Allegory in the Middle Ages|in all four modes of medieval ''exegesis'']]: literally as historical fact, and [[allegory|allegorically]] as the death of the ancient order at the coming of the new.{{Original research inline|date=July 2013}}
